Disclaimer: 99.9% of political ads are lies, distortions and half truths. From both parties, from all groups.
With that said, the Romney campaign has taken things to a level almost of the Swift Boat myths of the Bush days.
The claim made in Romney's ads in Ohio, a state Romney is losing in and that has been pummeled by the loss of manufacturing jobs over the past 30 years, are 100% lies. Lies, not distortions, but flat out lies, refuted by the very companies Romney was lying about.
Jeep is NOT moving jobs from Ohio to China, nor is GM cutting American jobs to move to China. Both companies are expanding in China, operations COMPLETELY SEPARATE from their North American operations.
Both Fiat, speaking about their Jeep division, and GM have refuted the Romney camp's ads, and beyond ads, things Romney has hinted at in speeches.
Romney, someone who made millions gutting companies and laying off workers, is amazing in his gall. The man will literally say anything to get elected. When you are the most accomplished political waffler, that is saying something and what it's saying isn't good.
Now, I'm not saying the Obama campaign is 100% truthful. I'm sick of political ads and political lies. But the extreme's Romney is going to is pathetic. The man is not fit to run the country because as far as I can tell he has no actual beliefs of his own, merely what it takes to get elected to the next office.
Seriously, look at how his views have changed from his days as governor of Massachusetts. Its not slight wavering to gain politcal wiggle room, its wholesale changes in a desperate attempt to get elected and its pathetic.
I could handle the old Romney, Governor Romney as President. This man he's decided to become, its sickening. Its honestly sad when Obama, someone who accomplished little of his established goals and showed little of his stated beliefs in his first term, comes across as the more honest, principled option.
Ugh.
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Layoffs
So now the Koch brothers are warning of layoffs if Obama is reelected joining other rich plutocrats threatening the peasants if the peasants don't act according to their wishes.
Really. This is where we are in America? THESE are our leaders of industry? Men who (like the Koch brothers) have run successful businesses, made themselves PILES of money, and now, somehow, if Obama is reelected they are going to have to lay off everyday workers to stay profitable?
Hmm. I think this is a load of crap.
Why?
Oh, because of the tens, if not hundreds of millions these men have spent on political campaigns. Instead of reinvesting it in their businesses, or keeping it for tougher times, no, its their money, they can do what they want, so they try and get friendly politicians elected.
But then, if things don't go their way, they cry, take their ball and go home, and make their workers suffer so that they can keep their huge incomes and replenish the spending cash for the next election cycle in four years.
Look, I understand that its hard to run a business in the US. We need to overhaul our corporate tax system and we need to streamline and improve our regulating processes. I am NOT anti-businessman especially since, as much as I despise their politics the Koch brothers at least own businesses that PRODUCE things unlike the Wall Street boys that just shift data in computers.
That said, the whole "I made mine if you don't like it go make your own" mentality of too many of the wealthy in this country is nauseating. Its selfish and its destructive. And if they somehow believe that threatening their employees is going to solve America's problems, well, good luck to them on that.
The blind, selfish, willful ignorance and hubris of so many wealthy people sickens me. Thanks Supreme Court for allowing these guys to try and buy election after election. That's certainly what the Founding Fathers you hold so dear envisioned that First Amendment being used for. Nice work.
This probably makes even less sense than most of my posts but I am sick and tired of the rich feeling every bit as entitled (to a far larger piece of the pie, in fact almost ALL the pie) as the poor they like to blame for all our problems.
Really. This is where we are in America? THESE are our leaders of industry? Men who (like the Koch brothers) have run successful businesses, made themselves PILES of money, and now, somehow, if Obama is reelected they are going to have to lay off everyday workers to stay profitable?
Hmm. I think this is a load of crap.
Why?
Oh, because of the tens, if not hundreds of millions these men have spent on political campaigns. Instead of reinvesting it in their businesses, or keeping it for tougher times, no, its their money, they can do what they want, so they try and get friendly politicians elected.
But then, if things don't go their way, they cry, take their ball and go home, and make their workers suffer so that they can keep their huge incomes and replenish the spending cash for the next election cycle in four years.
Look, I understand that its hard to run a business in the US. We need to overhaul our corporate tax system and we need to streamline and improve our regulating processes. I am NOT anti-businessman especially since, as much as I despise their politics the Koch brothers at least own businesses that PRODUCE things unlike the Wall Street boys that just shift data in computers.
That said, the whole "I made mine if you don't like it go make your own" mentality of too many of the wealthy in this country is nauseating. Its selfish and its destructive. And if they somehow believe that threatening their employees is going to solve America's problems, well, good luck to them on that.
The blind, selfish, willful ignorance and hubris of so many wealthy people sickens me. Thanks Supreme Court for allowing these guys to try and buy election after election. That's certainly what the Founding Fathers you hold so dear envisioned that First Amendment being used for. Nice work.
This probably makes even less sense than most of my posts but I am sick and tired of the rich feeling every bit as entitled (to a far larger piece of the pie, in fact almost ALL the pie) as the poor they like to blame for all our problems.
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Bullying
So, a chubby local newsperson gets an email from a buff lawyer ripping her about her weight.
Instead of doing what most people would do, ignoring the moron, she, in best local newsperson manner, decides to take it on air.
In a highly misguided statement she claims she is standing up for all the bullied people in the world. The kids who have to deal with being called fat, or short, or gay or whatever.
Ok, fine, except, no, you're not.
You were not bullied Ms. Livingston and you apparently don't have any idea what the word means.
To be bullied would mean you would be singled out, repeatedly, by one person, or a group, and humiliated, threatened, and/or mocked by those you are often in contact with.
Instead, you got one email from an idiot, some guy you don't know and never have to interact with.
Really, you're going to compare THAT to the kid getting mocked on the bus every day. To having his books pushed on the floor. To being picked on constantly by people he has to face, EVERY SINGLE DAY.
You don't even see how you trivialized bullying do you?
You honestly believe you were bullied and you were standing up for what's right.
You were wrong.
If it was a co-worker who everyday was making comments, then yes, that could easily be bullying.
But it wasn't, it was a random email from some schmuck.
So please, delete the email, suck it up and just go about your life.
Don't demean those who deal with bullying on a daily basis by comparing what they go through to an email from an idiot.
This is one more reason why local news should be banned. If there was no local news, there would be no local newspeople. Do you know what a boon this would be for not having crap TV?
Instead of doing what most people would do, ignoring the moron, she, in best local newsperson manner, decides to take it on air.
In a highly misguided statement she claims she is standing up for all the bullied people in the world. The kids who have to deal with being called fat, or short, or gay or whatever.
Ok, fine, except, no, you're not.
You were not bullied Ms. Livingston and you apparently don't have any idea what the word means.
To be bullied would mean you would be singled out, repeatedly, by one person, or a group, and humiliated, threatened, and/or mocked by those you are often in contact with.
Instead, you got one email from an idiot, some guy you don't know and never have to interact with.
Really, you're going to compare THAT to the kid getting mocked on the bus every day. To having his books pushed on the floor. To being picked on constantly by people he has to face, EVERY SINGLE DAY.
You don't even see how you trivialized bullying do you?
You honestly believe you were bullied and you were standing up for what's right.
You were wrong.
If it was a co-worker who everyday was making comments, then yes, that could easily be bullying.
But it wasn't, it was a random email from some schmuck.
So please, delete the email, suck it up and just go about your life.
Don't demean those who deal with bullying on a daily basis by comparing what they go through to an email from an idiot.
This is one more reason why local news should be banned. If there was no local news, there would be no local newspeople. Do you know what a boon this would be for not having crap TV?
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Racism
"Racism is not merely a simplistic hatred. It is, more often, broad sympathy toward some and broader skepticism toward others." -Ta-Nehisi Coates
Sorry America, that specter Racism is alive and well.
I know, I know, you don't want to admit it, but sorry, its true.
Its true in the little things you say, the little assumptions you make, the stereotypes you hold. Its there. You don't have to join the KKK, you don't have to call them N******, you don't have to do a lot of things, many racist attitudes are totally passive. Its about what you say, what you think, what you at heart believe.
Its funny how often I hear "well blacks can be racist too."
Ok, I agree, there is a certain percentage of the black population that is racist. They, like the vast majority of racist whites, veer towards the 2nd sentence of the quote.
There are racist black people, some of them as bad as any racist white.
BUT, before white folk get all justified in their own little prejudices, let me point something out, the blacks aren't the people in power.
WAIT you cry! White america is under attack! Look at all the benefits afforded minorities and women! Its so hard to be a white man!
No, its not.
White men still run this country. Pardon me, RICH white men run this country.
If you aren't one of them it isn't affirmative actions fault. It isn't NOW's fault. Its the oligarchy of good ol' boys and new money men who control most economic goings on in the US.
Here's the thing: People of all races suck. Basically humanity sucks. We're imperfect, we're flawed, we're damaged. BUT, when the group that holds power, and I'm sorry white america, you hold the power no matter how badly you want to believe you don't, holds ideas, prejudices (it can be proven, look at prison sentencing black v. white for the same crimes), hold beliefs, its far more damaging to the country than when the minority holds similar views.
This is NOT excusing minorities for any general "racist" beliefs they might hold. But, isn't it more understandable they would hold them when they are much more likely to be stopped and questioned by police (most often white), go to a lesser school than their white peers, and generally have the odds stacked against them?
Blacks in this country have had the deck stacked against them since the late 19th century. The gains made immediately after the Civil War, well, many of them died with Lincoln and others have been destroyed since, whether maliciously by blatantly racist laws or inadvertently by misguided social policy (see the Great Society, though, I sometimes wonder how inadvertent LBJ was really...).
We are generations deep, in all honestly we are almost 10 generations deep of black families being destroyed, first by slavery, then by economic factors, then by social engineering factors. Its unfortunate that so many black Americans have no idea how to live "normal," healthy lives.
I'm not even saying that they have to live like middle class Americans because frankly, I'm not sure that's healthy. But the violence that pervades so much of their culture, the lack of a father in too many young black men's lives (and anymore, that's certainly a white problem too), its tragic.
And while it does not excuse the eventual behavior, it helps to explain it. Instead of fearing, instead of holding prejudice, instead of viewing them as parasites (which so many people do, listen to how people talk, facts don't matter, there are millions on welfare doing nothing to support themselves....right..) maybe view them as fellow human beings. View them as fellow Americans, who just want to live their lives. Maybe you could support them, even third party, through groups trying to help the less fortunate.
White America, I'm sorry, but you're still horrifically racist. You need to start accepting that, because if you don't, if you, the majority race, don't, why on earth would any of the minority races attempt to do the same?
Sorry America, that specter Racism is alive and well.
I know, I know, you don't want to admit it, but sorry, its true.
Its true in the little things you say, the little assumptions you make, the stereotypes you hold. Its there. You don't have to join the KKK, you don't have to call them N******, you don't have to do a lot of things, many racist attitudes are totally passive. Its about what you say, what you think, what you at heart believe.
Its funny how often I hear "well blacks can be racist too."
Ok, I agree, there is a certain percentage of the black population that is racist. They, like the vast majority of racist whites, veer towards the 2nd sentence of the quote.
There are racist black people, some of them as bad as any racist white.
BUT, before white folk get all justified in their own little prejudices, let me point something out, the blacks aren't the people in power.
WAIT you cry! White america is under attack! Look at all the benefits afforded minorities and women! Its so hard to be a white man!
No, its not.
White men still run this country. Pardon me, RICH white men run this country.
If you aren't one of them it isn't affirmative actions fault. It isn't NOW's fault. Its the oligarchy of good ol' boys and new money men who control most economic goings on in the US.
Here's the thing: People of all races suck. Basically humanity sucks. We're imperfect, we're flawed, we're damaged. BUT, when the group that holds power, and I'm sorry white america, you hold the power no matter how badly you want to believe you don't, holds ideas, prejudices (it can be proven, look at prison sentencing black v. white for the same crimes), hold beliefs, its far more damaging to the country than when the minority holds similar views.
This is NOT excusing minorities for any general "racist" beliefs they might hold. But, isn't it more understandable they would hold them when they are much more likely to be stopped and questioned by police (most often white), go to a lesser school than their white peers, and generally have the odds stacked against them?
Blacks in this country have had the deck stacked against them since the late 19th century. The gains made immediately after the Civil War, well, many of them died with Lincoln and others have been destroyed since, whether maliciously by blatantly racist laws or inadvertently by misguided social policy (see the Great Society, though, I sometimes wonder how inadvertent LBJ was really...).
We are generations deep, in all honestly we are almost 10 generations deep of black families being destroyed, first by slavery, then by economic factors, then by social engineering factors. Its unfortunate that so many black Americans have no idea how to live "normal," healthy lives.
I'm not even saying that they have to live like middle class Americans because frankly, I'm not sure that's healthy. But the violence that pervades so much of their culture, the lack of a father in too many young black men's lives (and anymore, that's certainly a white problem too), its tragic.
And while it does not excuse the eventual behavior, it helps to explain it. Instead of fearing, instead of holding prejudice, instead of viewing them as parasites (which so many people do, listen to how people talk, facts don't matter, there are millions on welfare doing nothing to support themselves....right..) maybe view them as fellow human beings. View them as fellow Americans, who just want to live their lives. Maybe you could support them, even third party, through groups trying to help the less fortunate.
White America, I'm sorry, but you're still horrifically racist. You need to start accepting that, because if you don't, if you, the majority race, don't, why on earth would any of the minority races attempt to do the same?
Sunday, August 12, 2012
"[C]areer ambition was not to go to Washington"
Really Mitt? Really? You're saying a guy, who has worked essentially his WHOLE CAREER (except for a brief marketing consultant job at the family business to pad his resume for office) in Washington never had a career ambition there?
When exactly did he not have this ambition? When he was 8 and wanting to be a fireman or astronaut? Because by the time he was in college he was happily, even enthusiastically taking staffing jobs. His first job out of college was as a speechwriter for Jack Kemp. Yes, certainly seems like he didn't intend to work in Washington.
There are so many lies being thrown around by both sides its not even funny, but this one is pretty good. Mitt, admit it, you put Ryan on the ticket because you've never consistently stood for anything in your political career. Ryan was put there to give the conservatives peace of mind that you are a true believer, even when you're not in anything except Mitt.
Its interesting how Obama is called a socialist and communist (ignoring the fact the two are highly dissimilar) and its a bad thing. But Ryan, an avowed Objectivist, is somehow praised as a champion. Does the average person know anything about Objectivism? I'm thinking not.
Especially Christians because Objectivism is essentially anathema to the gospel of Christ though it is very much an American philosophy. (I have no idea of Mr. Paul's religious beliefs, but when the person who's philosophy you hold dear is summed up in this quote "My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute [2]." that doesn't leave a lot of leeway for Christ's message.)
This not saying that Marx's writings were kind to religion. "Religion is the opiate of the masses" doesn't leave much room for it either, but some of the basic ideals of socialism are not that far from some of Christ's teachings either. (I am not saying Christ was a socialist, merely pointing out that his life and the life of the early church has far more in common with socialist and even, gasp, communal, ideals than anything Rand ever imagined.)
It boggles the mind that while bi-partisan and non-partisan groups publish report after report that Ryan's budget and Romney's tax plan would shift even MORE of the tax burden to the middle class (since its simply impossible to cut the amount needed) middle class and even lower class whites flock to the idea.
I guess the obvious solution to any problem is to burn down and start over right? Oh, and make sure the rich don't have too pay too much in taxes because keeping their taxes low does an excellent job of creating jobs for people in this country.
Good job guys!
(President Obama, I can't even begin to describe how angry I am at your administration for putting forth essentially no good ideas over the last few years to combat the lunacy of the far-right economic folks. Its pathetic really.)
When exactly did he not have this ambition? When he was 8 and wanting to be a fireman or astronaut? Because by the time he was in college he was happily, even enthusiastically taking staffing jobs. His first job out of college was as a speechwriter for Jack Kemp. Yes, certainly seems like he didn't intend to work in Washington.
There are so many lies being thrown around by both sides its not even funny, but this one is pretty good. Mitt, admit it, you put Ryan on the ticket because you've never consistently stood for anything in your political career. Ryan was put there to give the conservatives peace of mind that you are a true believer, even when you're not in anything except Mitt.
Its interesting how Obama is called a socialist and communist (ignoring the fact the two are highly dissimilar) and its a bad thing. But Ryan, an avowed Objectivist, is somehow praised as a champion. Does the average person know anything about Objectivism? I'm thinking not.
Especially Christians because Objectivism is essentially anathema to the gospel of Christ though it is very much an American philosophy. (I have no idea of Mr. Paul's religious beliefs, but when the person who's philosophy you hold dear is summed up in this quote "My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute [2]." that doesn't leave a lot of leeway for Christ's message.)
This not saying that Marx's writings were kind to religion. "Religion is the opiate of the masses" doesn't leave much room for it either, but some of the basic ideals of socialism are not that far from some of Christ's teachings either. (I am not saying Christ was a socialist, merely pointing out that his life and the life of the early church has far more in common with socialist and even, gasp, communal, ideals than anything Rand ever imagined.)
It boggles the mind that while bi-partisan and non-partisan groups publish report after report that Ryan's budget and Romney's tax plan would shift even MORE of the tax burden to the middle class (since its simply impossible to cut the amount needed) middle class and even lower class whites flock to the idea.
I guess the obvious solution to any problem is to burn down and start over right? Oh, and make sure the rich don't have too pay too much in taxes because keeping their taxes low does an excellent job of creating jobs for people in this country.
Good job guys!
(President Obama, I can't even begin to describe how angry I am at your administration for putting forth essentially no good ideas over the last few years to combat the lunacy of the far-right economic folks. Its pathetic really.)
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Ah politics.
Representative Boehner, while talking on a Fox Radio show today made the statement concerning Obama that "He's never even had a real job for God's sake."
Now, I suppose Mr Boehner might not consider such things as being a community organizer, a civil rights lawyer, or a law professional real jobs, that's fine.
But what is absolutely hilarious about his statement is that Rep. Paul Ryan, the "mastermind" of the GOP's budget, actually NEVER has held a job outside of politics. He worked as a congressional staffer until he was approached about entering politics so he left being a staffer to work as a "marketing consultant" to his family's construction business briefly before running for office.
So, what would Mr. Boehner say about his fellow Congressman, who by Boehner's measuring stick must have actually held NEGATIVE jobs if Obama's jobs didn't count.
Its idiocy. The people in charge of both parties are idiots but I really really don't understand the Republican view of keeping the rich as rich as possible and somehow that will trickle down.
Oh well. Only a few more months until another 3 years of stagnant idiocy. *sigh*
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Time is an interesting thing...
I shared a post on my G+ about some really cool poster art that's up for sale. Its about modern things, video games and such, but done in a very 30s sci-fi or 40s propaganda style. They are gorgeous.
My first thought was "That would totally fit on the cover of a Buck Rogers story or a Harry Harrison collection!"
My dad's comment was "Looks like a Commander Cody and the Lost Planet Airmen cover!!" which it TOTALLY does.
Its a strange age we live in when a son's first thought jumps 30-40 years before the father's first thought!
Thanks to the internet, I've been exposed to early science fiction which often had fantastic covers. My dad, through his eclectic and wonderful taste in music, was exposed to this style of artwork through Commander Cody and the Lost Planet Airmen covers. The artists and probably band were obviously influenced by the Pulp & Golden Ages of Science fiction.
What does this mean? Nothing, except that we live in interesting times and that I really need to listen to more Commander Cody. My only experience with them is from the terrible/awesome movie Hollywood Boulevard and they were great!
My first thought was "That would totally fit on the cover of a Buck Rogers story or a Harry Harrison collection!"
My dad's comment was "Looks like a Commander Cody and the Lost Planet Airmen cover!!" which it TOTALLY does.
Its a strange age we live in when a son's first thought jumps 30-40 years before the father's first thought!
Thanks to the internet, I've been exposed to early science fiction which often had fantastic covers. My dad, through his eclectic and wonderful taste in music, was exposed to this style of artwork through Commander Cody and the Lost Planet Airmen covers. The artists and probably band were obviously influenced by the Pulp & Golden Ages of Science fiction.
What does this mean? Nothing, except that we live in interesting times and that I really need to listen to more Commander Cody. My only experience with them is from the terrible/awesome movie Hollywood Boulevard and they were great!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)