Really Mitt? Really? You're saying a guy, who has worked essentially his WHOLE CAREER (except for a brief marketing consultant job at the family business to pad his resume for office) in Washington never had a career ambition there?
When exactly did he not have this ambition? When he was 8 and wanting to be a fireman or astronaut? Because by the time he was in college he was happily, even enthusiastically taking staffing jobs. His first job out of college was as a speechwriter for Jack Kemp. Yes, certainly seems like he didn't intend to work in Washington.
There are so many lies being thrown around by both sides its not even funny, but this one is pretty good. Mitt, admit it, you put Ryan on the ticket because you've never consistently stood for anything in your political career. Ryan was put there to give the conservatives peace of mind that you are a true believer, even when you're not in anything except Mitt.
Its interesting how Obama is called a socialist and communist (ignoring the fact the two are highly dissimilar) and its a bad thing. But Ryan, an avowed Objectivist, is somehow praised as a champion. Does the average person know anything about Objectivism? I'm thinking not.
Especially Christians because Objectivism is essentially anathema to the gospel of Christ though it is very much an American philosophy. (I have no idea of Mr. Paul's religious beliefs, but when the person who's philosophy you hold dear is summed up in this quote "My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute [2]." that doesn't leave a lot of leeway for Christ's message.)
This not saying that Marx's writings were kind to religion. "Religion is the opiate of the masses" doesn't leave much room for it either, but some of the basic ideals of socialism are not that far from some of Christ's teachings either. (I am not saying Christ was a socialist, merely pointing out that his life and the life of the early church has far more in common with socialist and even, gasp, communal, ideals than anything Rand ever imagined.)
It boggles the mind that while bi-partisan and non-partisan groups publish report after report that Ryan's budget and Romney's tax plan would shift even MORE of the tax burden to the middle class (since its simply impossible to cut the amount needed) middle class and even lower class whites flock to the idea.
I guess the obvious solution to any problem is to burn down and start over right? Oh, and make sure the rich don't have too pay too much in taxes because keeping their taxes low does an excellent job of creating jobs for people in this country.
Good job guys!
(President Obama, I can't even begin to describe how angry I am at your administration for putting forth essentially no good ideas over the last few years to combat the lunacy of the far-right economic folks. Its pathetic really.)
Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Thursday, February 10, 2011
An Old School Republican's take on the last 30 years
Mother Jones did a great article based off interviews with David Stockman, Reagan's first budget director.
He's a fiscal conservative, but he's a true fiscal conservative. He understands that just cutting taxes while spending the same amount, more, or with tiny spending decreases doesn't work.
He's appalled by the continual military spending going up and up (his suggest chop 100-150 billion off the Pentagon's budget in one year, currently we're aiming to lower it by 78 billion over a total of 5 years) and was against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Also, he views the "casino" that is Wall Street as bad for Main Street and the US economy as a whole. He supports the "Tobin tax" which would tax financial transactions and could generate 100 billion dollars a year. It also might have the effect of making the market a place where middle class people might actually be able to make some money. But yes, a Republican who supports a tax!
Its a very interesting and informative read and I just wanted to share it.
He's a fiscal conservative, but he's a true fiscal conservative. He understands that just cutting taxes while spending the same amount, more, or with tiny spending decreases doesn't work.
He's appalled by the continual military spending going up and up (his suggest chop 100-150 billion off the Pentagon's budget in one year, currently we're aiming to lower it by 78 billion over a total of 5 years) and was against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Also, he views the "casino" that is Wall Street as bad for Main Street and the US economy as a whole. He supports the "Tobin tax" which would tax financial transactions and could generate 100 billion dollars a year. It also might have the effect of making the market a place where middle class people might actually be able to make some money. But yes, a Republican who supports a tax!
Its a very interesting and informative read and I just wanted to share it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)